Timothy Vibbard was apparently the youngest child and only son of
John Vibbard and his wife Mary Arnold. He reports his date of birth as 20 Oct 1750
(in Connecticut) in his Revolutionary War pension application but the only
birth-related record found in Connecticut was a record of baptism for a Timothy
Vibbard in the First Church, East Hartford on 25 June
1749. This Timothy was listed as a son
of John. It is possibly that the Timothy
who removed to
For the
time being, I have chosen to put him with John and treat the two Timothys as the same person. Although James Vibert
was apparently married to his wife Dorcas Dix in the
early to mid-1740s, they apparently had at least 5 children born before 1752 so
it seems a little crowded to place Timothy in that family
Timothy
married a woman named Rebecca (--?--) before 01 Jul 1770 when they owned the
covenant together in the First Church, East Hartford, possibly in anticipation
of the birth of their first child, a daughter also named Rebecca who was
baptized in the same church on 09 Sep 1770.
Their son Leonard also claimed to be born in
Timothy and
Rebecca eventually settled in the Saratoga County, New York area and apparently
had somewhere between ten and fifteen children.
They seem to have been the progenitors of almost all of the families in
the
The family
appears in all censuses from 1790 through 1830, all in
1.
Timothy Vibbard, son of
John is listed in the Church Record Index at the
2.
Timothy Vibert and wife
Rebecca owned the covenant in
3.
Rebecca Vibert, daughter of
Timothy was baptized in
4.
Timothy Vibbard of NY
reports his birth date in his Rev War pension application as
5.
The 1790 Federal Census for Ballstown,
Timothy Vabbard
with 2 males over 16, 4 males under 16 and 6 females
6.
The 1800 Federal Census for
a. (Albany County) – Timothy Vibbard with 1 male 45+, 1 female 45+, 1 male 16-26, 1 male 10-15, 2 females 10-15, 1 male under 10, 2 females under 10 [Noah(?), William(?), Reuben (age 9), 4 younger daughters(all < 16)]
b. (
c. (
7.
The 1810 Federal Census for
a.
(
b.
(
c.
(Half Moon) – John Vibbard
with
d.
(
e.
(
f.
(
8.
Timothy mentions a son Reuben on his pension
application in 1833. He may be born
9.
A Timothy Vibbard Jr. is
reported as the father of Chauncey Vibbard (the
railroad guy) in his published biographies.
This probably is a son of Timothy.
10.
A Timothy Vibbard is buried
in the
11.
Also buried in the same cemetery are Colonel Noah Vibbard (1780-3/20/1853, AE 73y) and his wife Margaret
(1780-7/15/1857, AE 77y, 1m, 13d).
12.
A John Vibbard (d.
13.
An Anna Keeler, wife of John Vibbard
(1771-1799) is buried in
14.
A John Vibbard “of
15.
Timothy died sometime after his pension application
in 1833.
Timothy’s Timetable (from the pension file) with some
additions
Timothy born 1749-1750
Timothy marries about
1769 Rebecca (--?--)
Rebecca born 1770 East Hartford, Hartford County,
CT
(John born) about
1770
Leonard born 1772
Moved to NY 1772-1775
enlistment, stayed until (1832 – 43 years) = 1789
Enlisted 1775
Timothy Jr. born 1777
Noah born 1780 New Canaan, Columbia County, NY
5 other children born 1780-1790 probably in
Rebecca marries 1787 John Harwood of
Moved to VT 1789
1790 Census 1790 Ballstown,
Reuben born 1791 possibly in VT
John marries 1790-1799? Anna Keeler
Moved to NY 1796
Moved 1797 Ballston,
1800 Census 1800
Noah marries after
1800 Margaret?
Leonard marries 1803 Betsy Klumph
Moved 1803 Glenville,
Moved 1808
William marries about
1808?
1810 Census 1810
Moved 1814
pension application
1820 Census 1820
1830 Census 1830
Applied for pension
Died abt
1.
Timothy, son of John Vibbard
and Mary Arnold, was born in
2.
He married Rebecca (--?--) (who was also born in the
3.
Their first child, Rebecca was born in
4.
Their oldest son John was born in
5.
Their second son Leonard was born in
6.
Sometime between 1772 and his enlistment in 1775,
they moved to
7.
They had a son, Timothy Jr., in 1777 and another,
Noah, in 1780.
8.
They had at least 5 other children between 1780 and
1790 including a son, William, and 4 daughters.
9.
They had a son Reuben whose birth date may be
1.
This is Timothy’s stated birth date. The child baptized
2.
He and Rebecca owned the covenant on that date. It seems as though couples often did that
around (after) the birth of their first child. [I think the churches were
requiring it as a prerequisite for baptizing the couple’s children.]
3.
See #2. She
was baptized on
4.
Just a guess based on the fact that his first wife
Anna Keeler was born in 1771. He could
have been born between Leonard and Timothy Jr.
5.
Kathy Kuroda has information that Leonard Vibbard was born in
6.
This is based on Leonard’s presumed place of birth
and Timothy’s pension statement.
7.
Timothy Jr. and Noah’s DOB based on cemetery data.
8.
This is based on the data from the 1800 Census. It might include non-family members but I
have just taken it at face value.
9.
Reuben’s DOB was provided by Earl Vibbard
and needs to be substantiated but it is looking more likely based on the census
data. The 5 children presumably born in
the 1780s nicely fill up the 11-year gap that previously existed between the
births of Noah and Reuben.
Rationale for Identification of Timothy’s Children
General comments
Only 3 children can be tied back directly to Timothy and
Rebecca – Rebecca by her baptismal record, Timothy Jr. by his name and Reuben
by his being mentioned in Timothy’s pension affidavit. Since Rebecca also appears to be the first
child, she provides a starting point from 1770 for Timothy and Rebecca’s
children. Can we set an end point? Timothy must have been barely 20 when Rebecca
was born so his wife would most likely have been younger than that and she
could have had kids to age 45 or so. Somewhere between 1790 and 1800 probably. During that time period, it does not appear
that any other Vibbard (or Vibert)
family had relocated to NY. Even later,
CT emigrants seem to have located farther west than the
In addition, the Vibbard spelling
of the name strongly correlates with Timothy’s family. With the exception of Epaphras,
we have not seen anyone consistently spelling the name that way other than
Timothy’s clan. Again, anyone born
during the window period who spells the name that way must be considered as a
possible child of Timothy. Another name
issue is that Timothy’s children seem to have often named their children after
their siblings (this is particularly so in the Timothy Jr. family).
The next parameters are provided by the censuses. The 1790 gives us a set of 5 sons and 5
daughters plus Reuben who was born in 1791 always assuming that all the younger
individuals are Timothy and Rebecca’s children. Reuben is not born yet. They lay out as follows:
1790 –
– (no Rebecca)
son age >= 16 (born before 1874) – probably John or Leonard
– (missing John or Leonard)
son age < 16 (born from 1775-1790) – probably Timothy
Jr., Noah, William or
son age < 16 (born from 1775-1790) – probably Timothy
Jr., Noah, William or
son age < 16 (born from 1775-1790) – probably Timothy
Jr., Noah, William or
son age
< 16 (born from 1775-1790) – probably Timothy Jr., Noah, William or
dau born from 1770-1790) - Lucy
dau born from 1770-1790) – Philomelia (b. 1788)
dau born from 1770-1790)
dau born from 1770-1790)
dau born from 1770-1790)
In 1800, Rebecca (Crapo), John and Timothy Jr. are
enumerated separately. Again, the
breakdown assumes that the younger individuals are children of Timothy and
Rebecca. This is especially an issue for
the two females born after 1790. John’s
first wife Anna Keeler died in 1799.
There don’t seem to have been any children but he does have two extra
people in the house – both younger but not young enough to be children. Could be a brother and
sister helping out.
1800 –
dau age 26-44 (born from
1766-1774) – Rebecca (enumerated with Hezekiah Crapo) (age 30)
– (no Leonard)
son age 26-44 (born from 1766-1774) – John (enumerated
separately but possible child of
Timothy)
son age 16-25 (born from 1775-1784) – Timothy Jr.
(enumerated separately and definitely
identified as child of Timothy) (age 23)
son age 16-25 (born from 1775-1784) – probably Noah, William
or
son age 10-15 (born from 1785-1790) – probably Noah, William
or
– (missing Noah, William or
son age < 10 (born after 1790) – probably Reuben
(age 9)
– Lucy is gone (m. abt 1798)
dau age 10-15 (born from
1785-1790) – Philomelia (b. 1788)
dau age 10-15 (born from
1785-1790)
dau age < 10 (born after 1790)
dau age < 10 (born after 1790)
In 1810 Rebecca disappears again (Hezekiah Crapo died in
1806) and John, Timothy Jr., Noah and William are enumerated separately.
1810 –
– (no Rebecca)
– (no Leonard)
son age >= 45 (born before 1765) – John (enumerated separately but
possible child of
Timothy)
– age is bad
son age 26-44 (born from 1766-1784) – Timothy Jr.
(enumerated separately and definitely
identified as child of Timothy) (age 33)
son age 26-44 (born from 1766-1784) – Noah (enumerated
separately) (age 30)
son age 26-44 (born from 1766-1784) – William (enumerated
separately) (b. 1780-1784, probably
1782-1784)
– (no
son age 16-25 (born from 1785-1794) – probably Reuben (age
19)
dau age 16-25 (born from
1785-1794)
In 1820 all the sons are enumerated separately. Timothy and Rebecca do have two youngsters
under 10 still with them (grandchildren?).
1820 –
– (no Rebecca)
– (no Leonard)
son age >= 45 (born before 1765) – John (enumerated separately but
possible child of
Timothy)
son age 26-45(born from 1775-1794) – Timothy Jr. (enumerated separately and
definitely
identified as child of Timothy) (age 43)
son age 26-45(born from 1775-1794) – Noah (enumerated separately) (age 40)
son age 26-45(born from 1775-1794) – William (enumerated separately) (b.
1780-1784, probably
1782-1784)
– (
son age 26-45(born from 1775-1794) – Reuben (enumerated separately) (age 29)
In 1830 there are lots of missing people.
1830 –
– (no Rebecca)
– (no Leonard)
son age 50-60 (born from 1770-1780) – John (enumerated
separately but possible child of
Timothy)
– (Timothy Jr. died 1823)
son age 40-50(born from 1780-1790) – Noah (enumerated separately) (age 50)
– (no William)
son age 40-50(born from 1780-1790) –
– (no Reuben)
Who are the candidates
1.
Rebecca – She is identified in
2.
Leonard – He is listed in the Klumpf
family history as having been born on
3.
John – His first wife Anna Keeler was born in 1771
and died in 1799 so he was born early in the family (but we don’t know exactly
where in the order). He is associated
with the
4.
Timothy Jr. – His father was likely (but not
definitely) named Timothy. He was born
in 1777 according to his gravestone and the family bible. He is associated with the
5.
Noah – He is born in 1780 according to his gravestone
and is buried in the same cemetery as Timothy Jr. He is associated with the
6.
William – He is listed in the
7.
8.
Reuben – He is identified in Timothy’s pension
application as a son.
9.
Lucy – this is the Lucy Vibbard
who married Richard Ogden. We don’t have
much corroboration of the way she spelled her name but Richard was born in 1760
so if Lucy is indeed a daughter of Timothy, she would be one of the older
children. Based on the DOBs of her children, she would have been born in the
1775-1780 range which puts her in Timothy’s “window”.
10.
Philomelia – She is
the wife of Job Almy and was born around 1788. She is reported in an Almy
genealogy.
Note that there is a problem with this list in that there
are too many candidates for Timothy’s assumed number of 5 sons in 1790. Even assuming that Reuben was born after the
census, we still have 6 candidates for 5 positions. The simplest explanation is that one of the 6
is not a son of Timothy but since all of the evidence about John, Noah, William
and Chester A. is pretty circumstantial, it is hard to decide which to
eliminate. The evidence for Leonard is
pretty slim too.
Another possibility is that one of the older sons was
already out of the household by 1790.
However, we have found no evidence of another Vibbard
in
We now have names for two other daughters in addition to
Rebecca, both probably born before the 1790 census. There are 5 of them on the 1790 and an
additional 2 on the 1800. It is possible
that one of the 1790 ones is Rebecca since she was widowed in 1789 but that
would mean that one of the males < 16 would likely be her son John, age
1-2. That would make our male problem
even worse! Rebecca would not be on the
1800 since she remarried in 1793. It is
possible that the 2 new females in 1800 are grandchildren (Rebecca is
enumerated as age 45+ in that census and I don’t think she could have been born
after 1755 since that would make her under 15 when Rebecca was born) but that
is not likely to be the case with the 5 1790 ones except as noted above.
Areas for Further Research
1. The biggest issue for this family is
the identity of Timothy’s wife Rebecca.
But there isn’t much to go on unless she turns up in another genealogy.
2. It would be nice to nail down a few
more of the girls but, again, in the absence of a will for Timothy, about all
we can do is wait for them to turn up, like Lucy and Philomelia,
in someone else’s genealogy.
3. I need to go over to